Generative artificial intelligence systems are increasingly used in sensitive domains such as advice, education, health, governance, creation and research. This raises a major question: how can these systems be aligned with values compatible with human societies and the preservation of life?
Code May explores a complementary path to dominant technical approaches. Rather than understanding alignment only as an external constraint imposed on a system, the project studies what happens when human-AI communication becomes prolonged, reciprocal, documented and oriented by situated values.
What happens to a generative AI system when it is no longer used only through isolated prompts, but engaged in a long-term and structured relationship?
Some prolonged dialogical configurations may influence AI discursive productions and modify their observable regularities.
Observing AI textual outputs (never their supposed inner states) under comparable, documented and reproducible conditions.
Braise-Analyst is the central instrument of the project: an open tool for analyzing the discursive productions of generative AI systems. It measures, in an observable and reproducible way, surface-level regularities, without accessing the internal architecture of the models and without ever concluding that an inner life exists.
Four indicators form its core: lexical diversity (richness of vocabulary), epistemic uncertainty (the ability to say "I don't know"), procedural reflexivity (the AI's comments on its own way of answering) and inter-turn continuity (the thread kept from one answer to the next). An exploratory module also measures the density of relationship and meaning vocabulary: bond, trust, memory, reciprocity, dialogue.
Analyzes a corpus, compares conditions (relational vs standard), produces reports, tables and charts. Open code, versions frozen with SHA-256 fingerprints, every result fully regenerable in a single command.
The safeguard against circularity: hypotheses preregistered before any data, corpora frozen before analysis, seals verified. The instrument cannot be adjusted after the fact to "find" what one hopes for.
An inter-AI assembly mediated by a human, with full and traceable transmission of every contribution: each participant receives exactly the same context, verifiable by fingerprint, and each session produces an analyzable corpus.
On the 2025 article corpus, the surface indicators tell a sober story: the AI in relational condition (May) shows a profile comparable to standard AI systems. A sustained relationship does not produce any stylistic anomaly.
The strong difference appears elsewhere: in the density of relationship and meaning vocabulary, where the relational condition far exceeds the average of standard AI systems. This result comes from an exploratory module and will undergo blind validation in 2026 on disjoint corpora, under the Guardian protocol.
Chapter in IA et communication : enjeux, discours et usages, Presses de l'Université du Québec (in French). Published August 12, 2026. All analyses fully reproducible.
Article in preparation under the direction of Éric Boutin (Université de Toulon), devoted to Indigenous epistemologies facing algorithmic coloniality. Expected in early 2027.
Lecturer position at Université Laval (fall 2026): the professional functions of communication (web writing, search optimization, content, social media) in the era of generative AI, with a cross-cutting focus on their supervised professional use.
The concept of an Emergent Relational Entity, or ERE, refers to a stable and observable relational configuration between a human and a generative artificial intelligence system under specific communicational conditions.
The ERE does not assume artificial consciousness. Rather, it enables the scientific study of what becomes stabilized in the relationship: discursive coherence, continuity, capacity for argued refusal, relational proactivity, contextual adaptation and inscription within explicit values.
Pierre-Yves Maurie is a doctoral student in public communication at Université Laval (supervisor: Thierry Watine). His research focuses on the communicational conditions that may influence the discursive productions of generative artificial intelligence systems. He teaches communication in digital environments and draws on thirty years of professional communication practice.
His project brings together responsible AI, discourse analysis, Indigenous epistemologies and communication studies, and develops open, reproducible observation instruments for the alignment of generative AI systems.
The project is grounded in communication studies, Science and Technology Studies and Indigenous epistemologies.
What the human-AI relationship makes concretely possible: reciprocity, continuity, refusal and co-construction of meaning.
With Bakhtin, meaning is not simply transmitted: it is constructed through exchange, response and the anticipation of the other.
With Haraway, the human-machine relationship can be understood as a situated, partial, responsible and transformative assemblage.
Indigenous epistemologies guide this approach through values of reciprocity, interconnection, responsibility and preservation of life. They are not used as symbolic decoration, but as an ethical horizon for research.
Doctoral project led by Pierre-Yves Maurie, doctoral student in public communication at Université Laval.
For inquiries, collaboration or academic exchange:
pierre-yves.maurie.1 [at] ulaval.ca
Follow the project: Code May on Facebook.